The ‘money’ quote by IPCC author & warmists Pielke
“It is remarkable to see people like Paul Krugman and John Holdren brazenly make completely false claims in public about my work and my views. That they make such false claims with apparently no consequences says something about the nature of debate surrounding climate.”
[Hint: it’s not ‘remarkable’ given their history of alarmism but it’s nice to see others catching up with the lying nut jobs leading the debate.]
By Paul Homewood
Breitbart carry the story of how Roger Pielke Jr was forced out of writing for the FiveThirtyEight blog, for not toeing the party line.
Environmental studies professor Roger Pielke, Jr. has quit Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight blog over a controversy that arose after he wrote a post denying that global warming is responsible for the increasing costs of recovery from natural disasters.
Pielke, a professor in the Environmental Studies Program and a Fellow of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), reported to Discover Magazine that over the last month he began to find that his work was being rejected by FiveThirtyEight. So, he told editor Mike Wilson that he quit.
The controversy grew after Pielke posted a March 19 story he entitled, “Disasters Cost More Than Ever–But Not Because of Climate Change.”
As soon as he posted the piece, the laymen critics in Silver’s…
View original post 293 more words
WeatherAction News 
What the Warmist did to Roger Pielke Jr; ”Skeptics” are practicing regularly – if it doesn’t fit their mythology and pagan beliefs, when some truth is introduced => trash, blacklist / excommunicate…
I’m on your side, if you cannot debate me; how can you debate the Warmist? They also know that all Ian Plimer’s crap is shoveled by the ”Skeptics” but they don’t dispute it – because it suits them, Skeptics to do the Warmist dirty job = to lie to the ignorant that the ”overall global temp goes up and down as a yo-yo.” 2] to ”believe 101% that: 6000 thermometers monitoring is enough, to monitor the temp on the WHOLE planet… hallelujah!!!..
Stefan – I find ‘skeptics’ include a broad swathe of opinion much of which we do not agree with either. Piers has made his opinion quite well known about the ‘lukewarmers’ (one paradigm replacing another or ‘here’s the new boss same as the old boss’) – see his Electric Universe talk.
Think there’s a degree of crossed wires here – so sorry if I came across harsh have little connection at the moment so mostly short comments probably not helpful.
yes some ‘skeptics’ are censoring debate (heard it called the west coast posse). Tallbloke and the whole Pattern Recognition in Physics debacle is a recent case. Many voices just want the same regime with a new face so the public pocket pilfering can continue.