Nothing like a nice linear trend
Tim writes: here we have a demonstration of both sides of scientific and organisational integrity. Ten years later, 2005, there was confirmation of the poor practice.
Some time ago Part 1 was published
The last line of the 1995 email was withheld. Here it is
Our daily series is anchored to the monthly one so that
each months average calculated from the daily data equals its value
in Manleys monthly series.
The Met Office promote “Hadley Centre Central England Temperature” and HadCET but avoid “Manley CET”. There was and is no daily Manley CET. The Met Office made one up, adjusting daily figures to average the Manley CET monthly value exactly.
January 1974 onwards there is no Manley CET data to constrain Met Office daily figures.
Above is an image of the email, the verbatim server files from US publishing site are here inside a…
View original post 804 more words