New analysis attempts to reconcile differences between satellites and climate models

The degree of doublethink required to publish this is quite astonishing

Rather than being an indicator of fundamental model errors, the model-satellite difference can largely be explained by natural fluctuations in Earth’s climate and imperfections in climate-model forcing agents

It very much brings to mind what Jaime Jessop said back in July:

In a normal world, this would prompt scientists to conclude that the models were faulty and that perhaps the science and a priori assumptions which are built into them need to be re-examined. Or they would ask themselves, did some other factor or factors contribute significantly to this event?

Total Model Failure…So it must be worse than we thought

Space satellite orbiting the earth An academic attempt to gloss over some glaring discrepancies between results from theory-based climate models and observed data. The research paper says: ‘Climate-model simulations exhibit approximately two times more tropical tropospheric warming than satellite observations since 1979’. Over forty years of being so wrong, by their own admission, takes a […]

New analysis attempts to reconcile differences between satellites and climate models