A benefit of increased Carbon Dioxide: increased efficiency in tree growth, no “Mike’s Nature trick” needed

Plants and people in cold climes ❤ CO2, Environmentalists and bankers* hate CO2 (for us plebs and plants).

I'm with nature on this one 😉

https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/high_resolution1.png

* Amber Rudd used to work for JP Morgan. Former BBC Environment 'churnalist' Richard Black approves of her appointment –

“The appointment of Amber Rudd as Energy and Climate Change Secretary is significant in that it shows that the Conservative Party leadership retains its commitment to policies based on sound climate science,” said Richard Black, director of the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/11597112/Greens-welcome-Amber-Rudd-as-new-Energy-Secretary.html

Watts Up With That?

Gosh, whouda thunk it? There goes Mann’s hockey stick. No wonder he had to truncate all the data after 1960 and splice on the instrumental record. Of course, as I’ve said before, Mann ignored Liebigs Law to make the “big lies” called “Mikes Nature trick” and “hide the decline“. Trees simply can’t be just a proxy for temperature, they are also a proxy for water, CO2, sunlight, nutrients, etc. The total growth response of a tree is the product of all environmental factors, not just temperature, something that any unbiased scientist should know and consider. Commercial greenhouse operators already know this.

hiding-the-decline-hockeystick-mann[1] Image courtesy Jo Nova, click image for her article

From the University of Exeter: Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide makes trees use water more efficiently

The increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration has allowed trees across Europe to use their available water resources more efficiently, new…

View original post 494 more words

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.